Location, Location, Location! Another choice women have today in breast augmentation is the placement of the implant. The options for breast implant placement are either in front or behind the Pectoralis Major muscle. In both instances the implant is placed behind the breast tissue. This ensures that the architecture of the milk ducts, blood vessels, and nerves from the breast tissue to the nipple and areola remains intact.

After the breast incision is made the tissue is dissected to the breast tissue – Pectoralis muscle junction. At this point the surgeon creates a space or pocket either in front of the muscle or behind the muscle to place the breast implant.

Breast implant location in breast augmentation

Breast implants can be placed in front or behind the pectoralis muscle

Sub Pectoral Implant Placement (behind the muscle)
Placement of the breast implant behind the muscle provides additional soft tissue coverage and allows for more of a breast slope. In women with very little breast tissue, placing the implant under the muscle reduces the risk of implant rippling or implant wrinkling. The pressure of the top portion of the muscle on the breast implant allows it to take on a more sloping appearance. It is also easier to image the breast tissue during mammograms. Studies have shown that placing implants behind the muscle are much less likely to form a capsular contracture, or hardening and distortion of the breast, from excessive scar tissue formation. The submuscular implant does have some disadvantages as well. Implant distortion may develop when the Pectoralis muscle is flexed.  This tightening of the muscle can cause the implant to move superiorly.

Advantages

  • Less likely to ripple
  • Lower risk of capsular contracture
  • Easier to read mammograms

Disadvantages

  • Implant distortion when the Pectoralis muscle is flexed

Pre Pectoral Implant Placement (in front of the muscle)
Placement of the breast implant in front of the muscle offers some distinct advantages as well as some disadvantages when compared to submuscular placement. As the muscle does not cover the implant, there is less tissue between the implant and the skin so rippling or wrinkling is more noticeable. For that reason I usually recommend using silicone implants when using a pre pectoral approach. Since there is no muscle coverage, implants placed in front of the muscle have a rounder shape. Also, the implant will not become distorted if the pectoralis muscle is flexed. In women with some breast drop, placing the implant in front of the muscle may prevent the need for a breast lift. Higher risk of capsular contracture occurs in women who have implants placed in front of the muscle.

Advantages

  • No implant distortion with muscle flexion
  • May prevent the need for a breast lift in women with breast droop

Disadvantages

  • More likely to ripple
  • Higher incidence of capsular contracture

As with all options for breast augmentation there are no right or wrong choices. These options exist to give the optimum results that the patient desires.

JJ2EWH29C5SD

About Dr. Matt Galumbeck

With over 20 years of clinical experience and having performed over 5,000 cosmetic surgery procedures, Dr. Matthew Galumbeck has the experience and skills to deliver outstanding cosmetic surgery outcomes.

A native of Virginia Beach, Matthew Galumbeck, MD received his undergraduate degree from the College of William and Mary, and his medical degree from Duke University. He trained in general surgery at Case Western Reserve University, and in plastic surgery at Eastern Virginia Medical School. Further study includes advanced training in body contouring in Paris.

View All Posts